- Use of technical terms is fairly good but could be consistent, particularly in the 'Ancillary Texts' section.
- The 'Ancillary Texts' sections also needs to show a clearer understanding of the different purposes of the two texts and the challenges faced in terms of producing them. Particularly given that the review would be produced by the magazine institution themselves rather than the production company behind the film. It is imperative in this section to recognise the institutional practices behind each text as well as the differences in audience targeting.
- Your response to your audience feedback is good but I think you could go into greater detail about changes you would make based on the feedback. Also, within that it should be a discussion of both meta and micro technical changes.
Finally, the section on use of technologies is well set out but it lacks the same 'evaluative' focus in comparison to your other sections. It tends to lean more towards 'this is what I used/did' rather than 'did I use these tools effectively?'
Notes for improvement:
ReplyDelete- Use of technical terms is fairly good but could be consistent, particularly in the 'Ancillary Texts' section.
- The 'Ancillary Texts' sections also needs to show a clearer understanding of the different purposes of the two texts and the challenges faced in terms of producing them. Particularly given that the review would be produced by the magazine institution themselves rather than the production company behind the film. It is imperative in this section to recognise the institutional practices behind each text as well as the differences in audience targeting.
- Your response to your audience feedback is good but I think you could go into greater detail about changes you would make based on the feedback. Also, within that it should be a discussion of both meta and micro technical changes.
Finally, the section on use of technologies is well set out but it lacks the same 'evaluative' focus in comparison to your other sections. It tends to lean more towards 'this is what I used/did' rather than 'did I use these tools effectively?'